Crackare Vodafone Station 3

The has suffered a problem most motorists can relate to — a tiny crack in one of its windows — although instead of a pebble from the road, this was caused by “space debris” the size of a paint fleck. British astronaut Tim Peake, who is currently on a six-month mission to the ISS, said the chip was in one of the Cupola windows, RT online reported. Although the window was damaged by a tiny piece of space debris, which the European Space Agency says was “possibly a paint fleck or small metal fragment no bigger than a few thousandths of a millimeter across”, a 7mm crack was left. Considering that the ISS travels at around 27,000 km per hour, it’s easy for debris to leave its mark, but the windows have been designed to withstand collisions. ALSO READ: The windows on board each have four panes of glass ranging from 1.2cm to 3.1cm thick, according to. There is also an exterior aluminum shutter that can be used for extra protection.

Although this was classed as a “minor” crack, larger debris could “pose a serious threat” with debris up to 1cm in size capable of disabling an instrument or a critical flight system on a satellite.

. Thomas Trutschel/Photothek/Getty Images Just as the FBI’s standoff with Apple seemed to be coming to a head, the government has abruptly changed course. And it may be backing down altogether from the most public battle in the growing war between law enforcement and tech firms over encryption. On Monday afternoon, the Justice Department filed a motion for a continuance on a hearing set to happen tomorrow in Riverside, California, where it would have argued its case that Apple must help it to crack the iPhone 5C of dead San Bernardino killer Syed Rizwan Farook. The FBI hasn’t given up on accessing the data in Farook’s phone. But it now says it may not need Apple’s assistance to crack the device after all, which it had previously told a judge it could legally compel using the 1789 law known as the All Writs Act. “On Sunday, March 20, 2016, an outside party demonstrated to the FBI a possible method for unlocking Farook’s iPhone,” the Justice Department’s lawyers wrote in a court filing.

2.1 Connecting your Vodafone Station to the fi xed network 2.2 Connecting a computer to your Vodafone Station using the PC/LAN cable 2.3 Connecting a computer to your Vodafone Station using a wireless connection (WiFi) 2.4 Factory resetting the Vodafone Station 2.5 Using Vodafone mobile broadband with your Vodafone Station 3 LCD screen. Crack Rete Vodafone Station Revolution >> bit.ly/2vcbLJ7.

“Testing is required to determine whether it is a viable method that will not compromise data on Farook’s iPhone. If the method is viable, it should eliminate the need for the assistance from Appleset forth in the All Writs Act Order in this case.” Shortly after the government’s filing, the court approved the motion, canceling tomorrow’s hearing. Instead, the Justice Department has asked for two more weeks to determine whether the method developed by that unnamed “outside party” is truly capable of unlocking Farook’s locked phone without altering its internal data. But the government’s move is already being interpreted as a decision to retreat from using the San Bernardino iPhone as the test case for whether tech companies can in fact be forced to help crack their own security measures. If the Justice Department were to continue to press for Apple’s cooperation after filing this motion, “they’ll have lost a ton of credibility with the court,” says Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney Nate Cardozo.

“I think this is a good indication that this San Bernardino fight is overChalk this one up as a win for Apple.”. Apple lawyers called the announcement a bolt out of the blue and said in a phone call today that this was the first they had learned that the government had continued to explore other methods to get into the phone without Apple’s help. They noted that the government had based its entire case on the assertion that it could not access data on the iPhone without Apple’s assistance, an assertion that FBI Director James Comey had reiterated during a recent hearing. If it turns out that the government can access the phone without Apple’s help then, there is no longer any basis to the case the government initially filed, the company’s lawyers said. The government’s announcement today introduces a new wrinkle for the Justice Department, however.

If authorities have found a software or system vulnerability into the iPhone, Apple’s lawyers said they will file a motion to obtain discovery and insist on knowing everything about the method—including who the third party is that discovered it and the nature of the zero-day vulnerability. The threat of revealing that vulnerability to Apple, however, may be the incentive that causes the government to drop the case entirely at this point, rather than have to disclose that information to Apple. The government has been heavily criticized in the past for withholding information about vulnerabilities in software so that law enforcement and intelligence agencies can use them to exploit. The White House insisted last year that it discloses about 90 percent of vulnerabilities to software makers so that they can be patched instead of exploited. But the government has also admitted that if a software hole has “a clear national security or law enforcement” use, officials. And if it turns out that a third-party commercial firm discovered the vulnerability the FBI plans to use to get into the San Bernardino phone, it may be under a legal obligation not to disclose that vulnerability if it has signed a non-disclosure agreement with the company. If the government does decide to cede the case to Apple in the iPhone standoff, it’s not giving up on breaking encryption that stymies law enforcement, Cardozo clarifies.

Technical experts watching the case have long believed Farook’s phone independently if they wished to, perhaps with the help of the NSA. And most observers of the case have guessed from the start that Farook’s phone likely didn’t contain much data of interest; investigators had already accessed an older backup of the phone, and admit that a metadata analysis also found no evidence of terrorist ties.

The Justice Department’s real motive, Apple, is to that can compel companies to assist in future cases when law enforcement can’t fully access their users’ data. “The FBI figured out another way in, which we knew they had or could get if they really wanted,” says Cardozo. “They made a strategic decision to call off this one as the test case.” The FBI’s change in tactics may partially be a result of the wave of public support Apple has received in its case, along with a. Everyone from privacy activists, to law professors, to iPhone-focused hackers, to fellow tech giants including Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Facebook made statements in Apple’s defense, arguing that the software the FBI demanded Apple create represented an undue burden on the company, set a dangerous precedent, and would ultimately lead to the weakening of Americans’ digital security. Apple didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

But a Justice Department spokesperson, in a statement sent to WIRED, maintained that the agency’s move to attempt to crack Farook’s iPhone independently squares with FBI director James Comey’s earlier statement in the case that “this litigation isn’t about trying to set a precedent or send any kind of message.” “Our top priority has always been gaining access into the phone used by the terrorist in San Bernardino. With this goal in mind, the FBI has continued in its efforts to gain access to the phone without Apple’s assistance, even during a month-long period of litigation with the company,” reads the statement from Justice Department spokesperson Melanie Newman. She added that the government is “cautiously optimistic” that this new strategy “will allow us to search the phone and continue our investigation into the terrorist attack that killed 14 people and wounded 22 people.” Meanwhile, the broader conflict between law enforcement and tech firms whose encryption impedes government surveillance is far from over. Just last week, the in a non-terrorism case, and told the Justice Department that it couldn’t comply due to its use of end-to-end encryption—a situation that’s been interpreted as a sign that. And Congress is still likely to weigh in, too. At times during the San Bernardino iPhone standoff, both Apple and the FBI called on Congress to resolve their dispute, and an encryption-focused bill from Senators Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr has been expected for weeks. All of that means that even if relations do warm between Apple and the FBI in the current conflict, the crypto cold war continues.

Kim Zetter contributed to this story. Here’s the full filing from the Justice Department asking the court to cancel tomorrow’s hearing. Apple Last week,: a zero-day iOS vulnerability that didn’t just work, but was actively being used by at least one government against a dissident. It turns out that mobile vulnerability works for Safari on Apple’s OS X as well, which is why you should go install the latest updates on your computer right now.

(If you haven’t updated iOS on your iPhone or iPad yet—go do that first.) Apple released Safari 9.1.3 and the OS X security update yesterday, citing the work of Citizen Lab and Lookout, the two research teams that discovered the iOS exploit that Apple patched last week. The description of the vulnerability in the Safari update release notes says that “visiting a maliciously crafted website may lead to arbitrary code execution,” which sounds identical to last week’s iOS flaw. That exploit allowed hackers to take full control over a victim’s device simply by tricking them into clicking on a malicious link.

Created by a shadowy cyberarms groups called NSO Group, the attack was discovered after a human rights activist named Ahmed Mansoor received two suspicious SMS messages. Suspecting a phishing attempt, he contacted researchers at Citizen Lab, who were able to identify the exploit’s exact mechanisms.

It’s not surprising that Apple’s desktop products are also affected; the vulnerability lies in Safari’s WebKit, the engine that drives web browsing on all of Apple’s hardware products. Little is known about NSO Group, but it typically sells to nation-states. In Mansoor’s case, it was likely the United Arab Emirates behind the snooping. Even if you’re not a political target, though, it’s prudent to protect yourself, especially since peace of mind is just a couple of quick updates away.

WIRED Apple has been called a lot of things over the years: Innovative, visionary, controlling, doomed. One thing it hasn’t really been called is “super active on Twitter.” The tech giant does have, offering tips and new announcements for the App Store, iTunes, Beats 1 Radio, and Apple Music. Apple executives Tim Cook, Phil Schiller, Angela Ahrendts, and Eddy Cue also have their own Twitter accounts. But there’s no all-encompassing @Apple account—or at least not. Today Apple seems to have just come down with a serious case of Tweetin’ fever!

A new microbloggin’ help desk called just launched, serving up “tips, tricks and helpful information.” (You’ll notice that Apple ditches serial commas like they’re MagSafe connectors, optical drives, or skeuomorphism.) The verified Twitter account also offers on-call answers to all those who @ it. That’s the idea, anyway. @AppleSupport hadn’t responded to our Twitter test-queries at writing time. But that’s probably because they’re really busy: In the three hours since the account was started, it has churned out 400 tweets and counting. The average wait time for a response looks like it’s about two hours. 1 In most cases, anyone who asks the @AppleSupport account a question is instructed to move the conversation to DM and provide more information about the hardware they’re using. Wait, what’s DM?

Well, they’ll even help you out with that one: DM stands for Direct Message in Twitter. — Apple Support (@AppleSupport). Josh Valcarcel/WIRED Remember the Apple AC adapters with the swappable prongs? The little plugin piece would slide so conveniently into the charging side? Apple said today that some of the swappable AC adapters have been found to present a risk of electrical shock.

So some of those are being recalled—and by some, we mean a lot. If you bought one of these bad boys between 2003 and 2015 in Continental Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Korea, Argentina, or Brazil, you should send it back. If you bought one of Apple’s World Traveler Adapter Kits during that period of time, yours is one of the affected as well. The issue is with the two-pronged power connector used in those regions. To find out if you have one of those bad plugs. If you do, the unsafe device can be exchanged for a safer one at an Apple Store or certified Apple service shop.

A young man separates cobalt from mud and rocks at a mine located between Lubumbashi and Kolwezi in the DRC, on May 31, 2015. Federico Scoppa/Getty Images Children as young as seven are working 12-hour days in dangerous conditions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo to mine the cobalt many global tech firms use in their smartphones, computers and cars, according to released today. The report claims the companies, which include Apple, Microsoft and Samsung, are not performing the basic checks that would ensure mineral mining operations don’t use child labor. Cobalt is a mineral used in the rechargeable lithium batteries that power many smart devices.

More than half the world’s cobalt comes from the DRC, a country long criticized for its use of child labor. In 2012, throughout the southern part of the country, and many of them were involved in cobalt mining. The authors of the current report interviewed 87 people, including 17 children, working at five different mine sites. People described working for as little as a dollar a day while enduring violence, extortion, intimidation, and health problems. Amnesty International and Afrewatch, an African NGO, say mines employing those people provided the cobalt in lithium batteries sold to 16 multinational brands. The cobalt reportedly came from Congo Dongfang Mining (CDM), one of the largest mineral processors in the DRC and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chinese mineral company Huayou Cobalt. The report says Huayou Cobalt sells to battery manufacturers, who say they sell to companies including Apple, Microsoft, Samsung and also Sony, Vodafone and others.

Responding to Amnesty International, Huayou Cobalt said it had no knowledge that the suppliers upon which it relied had hired child labor or operated unsafe working conditions. Samsung, Sony and Vodafone denied having a connection to this supply chain or to DRC Cobalt when asked by the authors of the report. Apple said it is evaluating a number of different materials, including cobalt, to identify both labor and environmental risks, according to the human rights groups, while Microsoft said it hadn’t traced cobalt use in Microsoft products all the way to the smelter level “due to the complexity and resources required.” The DRC has a long history of conflict driven by its massive mineral wealth.

According to a 2011 United Nations Environment Program report, “The DRC has the largest artisanal mining workforce in the world—around two million people—but a lack of controls have led to land degradation and pollution. Its untapped mineral reserves are of global importance and are estimated to be worth US$24 trillion.” Meanwhile, as global demand for cobalt rises, the market remains largely unregulated because it is outside the “conflict mineral” legislation regulating the extraction and sale of other minerals like gold and tin from the DRC. The new report’s authors are calling on multinational companies to better investigate their supply chains and be more transparent about where they get their materials. Apple Music for Android Apple As of today, users can check out a beta of.

It’s very much the same experience. You need an iCloud account to sign up (a clever move to turn more Android users into account holders), and if you’ve already used the free trial on iOS you won’t get it again here. Once you drop the $9.99 per month, you get the same bubbly setup screen, asking about genres and bands you like. You get Zane Lowe and Beats 1—it’s Worldwide! Always on!—along with the same set of playlists, radio stations, and recommendations as every other platform. Apple Music on Android nods to Android’s design language in spots, like the way it uses a hamburger menu rather than tabs.

The fonts on Android are a little bigger, too, and the cards a little more spacious. I like this design better than the iOS app, which feels a bit cluttered.

The only content difference I’ve found between iPhone and Android apps is the order of For You recommendations. Not the recommendations themselves, just the order in which they appear. Within the app, you’re getting essentially the same experience. But Apple does not seem terribly concerned with integrating Apple Music at a deeper level within Android. You can’t use Google Now to search within Apple Music, for instance—Siri is easily the most powerful guide to Apple Music, and you can’t replace the experience here.

Regardless of size, all organisations using Blueprint OneWorld can deliver compliance and demonstrate good governance through global industry best practices. 24/7 access to your corporate data; Guided by ICSA: The Governance Institute, the home of good governance; Highly secure user settings to protect your data. User manual computer

Vodafone

App Station Vodafone

Apple Music appears to need Android (and its billion-plus users) a lot more than Android needs Apple Music. The app looks good and works well, but at least in its beta stage it doesn’t look like more than a prettier but less powerful version of Google Play Music. Google’s service offers many of the same things, and many of them for free, plus the deep OS-level integration you get with Apple Music on an iPhone. Still, though, Apple Music is significant: It’s Apple’s first real Android app (beyond the one that helps you switch to the iPhone), and another example of just how important the future of music is to the future of Apple. Author: Molly McHugh. Date of Publication: 10.15.15. 10.15.15.

Vodafone Station Revolution

Time of Publication: 2:31 pm. 2:31 pm Jailbreak Gives Your Old iPhone 3D Touch Disclaimer: You should not jailbreak your iPhone. We do not advise you to jailbreak your iPhone.

Hey, are you are willing to jailbreak your older iOS device? Then you can get what’s arguably the most compelling feature of the latest iPhones: 3D Touch. If your iPhone 6 just doesn’t look so good next to the 6S anymore—and you’re known as a risk-taker—then here’s your chance at an easy upgrade. The, and it’s available in the Cydia jailbreak store. Author: Brian Barrett.

Vodafone Station Revolution

Date of Publication: 10.08.15. 10.08.15. Time of Publication: 4:31 pm. 4:31 pm Jony Ive Doesn’t Care About Your Steve Jobs Biopic Speaking at Vanity Fair’s New Establishment Summit, Apple design guru Jony Ive responded to a question about cinematic representations of Steve Jobs, his former friend and colleague, about how you might expect. He’s not a fan. While Ive says he hasn’t yet seen Aaron Sorkin’s Steve Jobs yet, he knows plenty of people who have, and more importantly he knows what we all suspect every time we sit to watch a two-hour movie about a decades-long life; there’s no way it can encapsulate the whole person.

“I just find it ever so sad,” Ive said to the crowd. “Jobs had his triumphs and his tragedies, like us all. And like most of us, he’s having his identity described, defined by a whole bunch of other people. I think that’s a bit of a struggle, personally.” The “most of us” here, presumably referring to people with enough notoriety to merit lengthy magazine profiles, biographical films, and mean tweets.

And rightly so; it’s impossible to capture every nuance of a life in such a short amount of time, in a single medium, or maybe even at all. Still, Ive might want to give Sorkin’s effort a try; it may not let us know Jobs in any meaningful way, but it surely.

Posted on